from the new york times:
West Virginia Ends Half-Century of Waiting
just a well-written overview of the game from the biased east coast media.
from the lexington herald-leader:
Cats fall to West Virginia 73-66
this is the game overview from the kentucky perspective. if you look at the url, the hed originally read "mountaineers stun uk"
Freshman back court was no match for West Virginia's defense
an analysis piece from a herald-leader columnist mark story.
Biggest game of the year wrong time for UK's weaknesses to rear up
another analysis. this, from herald-leader columnist john clay.
a couple of national publications ran live blogs charting the ebb and flow of the game in goofy, wry or downright brutal one-line observations.
from espn's college basketball nation blog:
This was supposed to be a coronation for Kentucky. Guess not.the quad blog at the times:
Based on uniforms alone, West Virginia should win this game. These black uniforms should add 5-10 points easily.finally, there's the cleanup and impressions.
here's a pair from the sporting news:
What We Learned: Mountaineers' 'Truck' ready to run in Final Four
a three-point synopsis of the ball game.
Final Four teams make case for defense
analysis on the recipe for final four success from mike decourcy.
West Virginia now thinking national title after toppling No. 1 Kentucky
a troubling, potential jinx of praise by perennial wvu scold stewart mandel at sports illustrated.
The Talent to Contend, and the Experience to Win It All
more ego-stroking, albeit leavened, by venerable times columnist william rhodes.
this is what i scan for hours after big wins.i suppose i do it for validation and to bask a little longer in the spotlight of attention for performance when it counted.
even as i write, it feels like resting on our laurels.
there are still two games to go before we can unequivocally say we've really done something.
i hope to God our boys aren't fawning over their press clippings the way i am.









